October 21, 2020

What are the Benefits of Publishing in a PLOS Journal?

Publishing research is a crucial part of a scholar’s career, and the ‘publish or perish’ philosophy in academics has made it extra challenging for researchers to get their work in timely. Because the journal publishing process is so complex, often taking months to go from submission to approval and publication, many scholars are looking for other ways to save time. One of those potential shortcuts is using a PLOS journal to get research out to a wide audience, but with benefits come some drawbacks.

The publish or perish philosophy in academics has been part of a scholar’s career for decades. As publishing opportunities increase in the Digital Era, this requirement is only increasing in pressure. Scholars are expected to overcome the global competition for research funding, generate innovative and unique ideas, keep up with all of their myriad responsibilities, and engage in research that is published in legitimate journals.

These high expectations can be difficult for many scholars to reach, particularly when it comes to finding a prestigious journal that will accept their work. The journal publishing process is complex and time-consuming. But shortcuts like PLOS journals, a publishing company that prides itself on being nonprofit and open-access in the fields of science, technology and medicine, are regularly becoming part of the accepted academic research process. In a time when the traditional methods are being revamped in favor of technology and efficiency, it’s tempting for scholars to turn to PLOS.

Open Access Changes the Landscape of Publishing

Journal publishers like PLOS wouldn’t have existed prior to open access and the Digital Era. But now, consumers are the primary driver of sales and business decisions. Publishers can’t argue with the billions of people who have demonstrated their preference for deriving their information and making their purchases online. To that end, paper journal subscription service popularity has diminished since the Digital Era has offered more options with open access publishing. Since OA journals are cheaper and accessible instantly, it’s not surprising that this is the preferred method of readership today.

Publishers have joined in to develop hybrid methods of paper and online open access journal offerings. Many open access mediums are free, so they are preferred by the average reader. But scholars who know that free doesn’t always mean reputable often don’t mind paying a small fee for a downloaded version.

Yet, authors want to get their work published where the largest audience is likely to be, even if they have to pay for the privilege. They know that the more their article is viewed, the higher the chances that it will be cited become. This increased citation improves their scholarly impact and ultimately increases their potential to get approved for scholarships or career path trajectories.

Open access is also tempting for many authors because when an article is published in a journal, the publisher owns the rights, not the researcher. To get access to the article, the reader must pay for it, but they can’t reuse the information without express permission from the publishing company, which often comes at a cost.

With open access, the author usually retains at least some of the rights and the reader is able to use the information obtained within the article as long as they provide proper attribution.

Publishing in a PLOS Journal

One new problem, albeit a good one to have, is that researchers now have too many options to publish their work rather than not enough. PLOS journals are preferred today because they offer benefits such as:

●      An integrity-filled process of choosing articles based on how valid the science behind it is, how rigorous the methodology contained is, and the qualification of meeting high levels of ethical standards.

●      A wider audience base, since the research is available to everyone immediately. There are no restrictions on using the work, the articles are highly accessible and discoverable, and anyone can read them.

●      The vast array of disciplines connected together in the PLOS community.

●      A reduction in the publication turnover time, including a fast but thorough peer review process.

Because PLOS journals are considered to be legitimate in an era where predatory publishers are running rampant, scholars are turning to these publishing sources regularly.

Tags PLOS PLOS Journal Researchers Publications
Jason Collins
Jason is a writer for many niche brands with experience “bringing stories to life” for both startups and corporate partners.

Related Articles

November 17, 2020
Sorting Through Research Funding Agencies That Support International Collaboration
November 23, 2020
Utilizing Elliptical Constructions to Optimize Research Impact
November 26, 2020
Managing a Group Blog for an Academic Research Project
December 2, 2020
Optimizing PowerPoint for Greater Research Impact
December 3, 2020
Addressing Ageism in Academic Publishing
November 25, 2020
Moving Beyond "Imposter Syndrome" for Greater Academic Achievement
November 18, 2020
The Purpose of Internships in the Research Landscape
November 20, 2020
The Role of Pricing and Subscription in Journal Impact
November 16, 2020
Managing Pre-Submission Requirements for Academic Publication
November 24, 2020
Active vs. Passive Voice in Scholasticism, and How to Approach Both